Maysa's Blog

Our journey through plagiocephaly and brachycephaly

Posts Tagged ‘Orthomerica’

Baby Miguel Part 2…

Posted by mymaysa on May 13, 2010

I just want to share with the world what a well fitting clear helmet should look like.  If you look at some of my earlier posts, and compare it to this one, you’ll notice that I am not only comparing apples to oranges.  I am comparing apples to bananas…

Baby Miguel was back here last week.  His daddy and mommy brought him.  I didn’t know they were coming again and I didn’t have my camera, but we figured out something else using a Flip camera.  So, here is how his helmet looks like on him.  Now, look further down and see how Maysa’s helmet from ECA looked like on her.  Apples and bananas, I tell you!

I enjoyed seeing Baby Miguel again and cannot get over his composure.  He has it all together, it is amazing!  Oh! and yes, his head is reshaping beautifully.  So happy for mom and dad, and Baby Miguel of course…

On a somewhat similar note, a co-worker’s daughter brought in her son yesterday.  They have been suspecting that he has a “flat head” as well but weren’t sure.  I actually got to meet the other little guy and fair enough, he showed textbook characteristics of brachycephaly to me.  I gave mom lots of advice and recommendations as the ped she saw said that it will round out eventually…  I know the story too well, I told her.

Posted in eastern cranial affiliates, Orthomerica, Pictures, Star Cranial Center of Excellence | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Baby Miguel…

Posted by mymaysa on April 12, 2010

I saw Baby Miguel on Friday.  His daddy brought him to work.  Miguel is 6 months old and has/had craniosynostosis.  Despite his parents concerns, he went undiagnosed by his pediatricians for a long time.  When his daddy first told me that he was going to have to wear a helmet, the clear type, I got worried.  Then he explained to me that he didn’t have plagio or brachy and that post operation, he would have to wear one of the clear ones from Starcranial in Columbia, MD.  I felt much better then.  I have nothing but good things to say about that place and the people who work there.  I knew that as long as everything went well with the operation, he would be in good hands with Laura Plank and Orthomerica.

So, it’s been just about a month since Miguel got his helmet.  When I saw him on Friday (unexpectedly), I had to hold him and give him an extra special hug.  Of course, after drooling over his cute little face and chubby puffy cheeks, I checked out his helmet.  It was a beautiful helmet.  The shape of that helmet was flawless.  It camed down just barely above his eyebrows.  The contour around his ears WAS traced right around his ears.  It came ALL THE WAY down to the base of his neck.  It was beautifully and perfectly ROUND in the back and just the right width and length.  A perfect ratio!  It also had a few holes and the pads (two at the sideburns and two in the back were extremely soft and clean).

Really, I almost cried I was so happy to see him wearing such a well-fitted helmet.  I haven’t seen Miguel’s latest scan.  Daddy keeps forgetting to swing it by, but from what he told me, he’s made great progress already.  To tell you the truth, when daddy took off the helmet for me to look at, Baby Miguel’s head looked pretty darn good to me!  He needs to grow in width a little more, but considering his age, I have absolutely no doubt that nobody will ever be able to tell that he’s ever had surgery or that he had to wear a helmet (for a year, they are saying).

I’ve never given a really good review about passive helmets, namely Maysa’s passive helmets (kidcaps) from ECA.  However, thumbs up for the one from Starcranial in Columbia, MD.  I wish I could put the two side by side.  It’s like night and day.  Maybe I’ll ask daddy to let me have it for a photo shoot once he’s done with it…

Posted in eastern cranial affiliates, Orthomerica, Star Cranial Center of Excellence | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The latest report(s)…

Posted by mymaysa on January 28, 2010

There are a few things you all need to know before you look at the reports: 

  • First of all, we didn’t see Laura Plank so the reports that I have do not reflect a comparison between now and her April scan.
  • The orthotist we saw was really nice and compationate and we actually didn’t have to pay a penny for the time he spent with us or the reports he handed us.
  • Right before he scanned her (and Maysa was screaming her lungs out and mad at the world) he told us that because of the thickness of her hair we were most likely to see a flat area on the scan.  To tell you the truth, I thought he was going to say that he wouldn’t be able to scan her BECAUSE of her hair.
  • To reassure me that her head wasn’t flat at level 3, he also gave me a level 2 report that shows how round it is right below level 3.  As you can see below, there is no way (anymore) that her head could be that flat at level 3 to then be round again at level 2
  • Also, remember that Maysa’s flat spot was never on the back left side but rather on the back right side.  So, in other words, ignore the flatness you see in the level 3 report.
  • At home, when I overlaid the scans (January and April), I found that the January scan was a little bit off-center, a little too much to the right and that is probably why her right side looks fuller than her left in that one.

Now, here are the reports:

Level 3 Report:

So, first of all, I removed some info at the top and added in the “Shape 2” column her numbers from the April scan.  Again, as you can see, she grew over 2cm in circumference.  She only grew about 1mm in width and almost 10mm in length.  Her plagio also got slighty better, although in real life it looks even better, and most importantly her cephalic index is down to 88.4% at this level (Level 3).

Now, in the Level 2 report below, you’ll notice how much rounder her head is in the back.  Non of that  non-sense flatness that you can see in level 3:

You might also be wondering why her ears look funny.  That is because her hair was sticking out a little on the right hand side.  The cranial breadth changes at that level but the orthotist told me that it was mainly because of the ears that show at that level.

One thing I am still not sure of is where her head actually grew in length.  When I overlay the April and the January scan, most of the growth seems to have happened in the front and a little bit in the back.  I never thought that her head would grow that much up front.  It is hard to say because the center point of the two scans are a bit off center.  That is really matter: No.  What matters is that we have an oval looking head that is not flat anymore with such little asymmetry.

Can you believe that the report below belongs to Maysa?

Posted in Maysa, Orthomerica, Pictures, post DOC band | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments »

Front Page Star… Maysa!

Posted by mymaysa on July 13, 2009

DSC_1346 - Copy

Maysa has been on the Front Page of the Yahoo Plagio Group since Thursday and just like all other Front Page Stars parents, I’ve been asked to share her story.  Most of it is in her blog but definitely not all of it.  I am having a hard time deciding on what to tell about and what to leave out, and then, I am having a hard time finding the time to do it…

Let’s see how much of it I can share today…

I’ll start by where we are now and say that Maysa graduated from her second DOC band a month and a half ago.  She looks good especially in the back where her head is now nicely curved.  Her forehead on the other hand looks more pronounced on the sides than normal.  It is wider than what it should have been and right now, I am having a hard time fixing her hair in such a way that it will not accentuate it.  Yes, while most parents would love for their plagio/brachy babies to have hair to cover the imperfections, Maysa’s thick and curly hair is quite challenging.  I tried cutting it last time, but that was quite a disaster.  I am glad that she is too young to care!

Changes in the second DOC band were not as dramatic as with the first DOC band but she still grew on the back up to the point where there was no more foam to shave off the back.  She tolerated it just as well as the first one but did manage to pull it off her head a couple of times.  Just like with the first band, Maysa never suffered from any rash from it and always slept well in her bands.

Maysa got her first DOC band when she was 9.5 months old.  It was in mid October of 2008 and I was so depressed about what had happened with her head shape after being in a passive helmet from Eastern Cranial Affiliates for 3.5 months, I thought that Maysa would never look right again.  We had put all of our faith in Joe Terpenning and we had trusted him.  However, while Maysa’s head was growing in the back, like it was supposed to, it seemed to me, after the second month, that it was also growing on the sides.  My husband couldn’t really see what I was talking about.  A trip to Orthomerica to see Laura Plank confirmed my fears.  Maysa’s head had been growing all around: in the back AND on the sides.  If you go by the numbers from her reports, both her plagio and brachy numbers were worse after 3.5 months of treatment.  Joe had just told us that she only had about one month left in the band.  It took Maysa 7 months in two DOC bands after that to bounce back and get a better shaped head.

So October was a month I’ll never forget.  I had to get a script as soon as possible to get her in a DOC band.  Maysa’s ped is not a believer in cranial molding helmets and thinks that Maysa’s head will round out.  Thanks to a parent on the Plagio Group, I am able to get a script from Dr. Natovitz who thinks Maysa is still young enough that she’ll benefit from it.  I take that script with me, just in case Maysa’s ped doesn’t write me one, but I very well know that in order for her band to have a chance be covered, the script has to come from her ped.  So I go and see her one more time and break in tears in front of her out of frustration as I can hear what she is about to tell me: “It will round out on its own, just give it some time Mom…”  She then tells me that she’ll send in for a referral but that it will most likely not be covered.  I tell her that we are ready to pay out of pocket if we have to, but that we need the script.  She sends it in.  It is approved.  Maysa gets her band on October 31, 2008.

Timing was perfect.  The moment Maysa got in her DOC band, her head started rounding out.  I literally saw changes within the first week which prompted me to start this blog.  I had to find a good way to keep track of her progress and posting pictures without overloading the Plagio Group or my personal calendar.  I also thought that it would be a good way for parents who are faced with plagio and brachy to find some information and the simple report of what our experience has been. 

I never ever thought in a million years that Joe Terpenning would try to intimidate me and threaten to take legal actions against me for what I had to say about him, his helmet and our experience with them.  I will have to post the letter that my attorney wrote to him in reply to his threats.  The bottom line is no one can prevent you from feeling the way you feel about someone or something, and as long as you are not lying or making up stuff, you should be fine…  Could you imagine the Internet without reviews about businesses?  People without opinions about their own experiences?  Inimaginable!

Anyway, so prior to the DOC band, Maysa was in two passive helmets from ECA.  Two, only because the first one broke after Joe adjusted it.  I think that Maysa’s head started popping out in the back during the first month she was in it but then things went down hill from there.  What makes me really sad is that we started treatment when Maysa was 5.5 months old and I feel that had she been in a better helmet at that young age, her head would look so much better now if not completely unnoticeable.  I still kick myself for making the wrong choice there.  Parents out there, do your research in and out and all over again before you start treatment, please do!

So before that, from 2 to 5 months of age, we notice that Maysa only looks to the right and that her head is starting to look “funny”.  We have absolutely no idea what plagiocephaly or brachycephaly are.  We have never seen babies in cranial molding helmets.  We don’t even know that babies can have torticollis.  We are absolutely clueless!  The ped doesn’t think that she has tort, just a preference to the right side and tells us to reposition her to the left and to stretch her neck to the other side.  She never tells us to be agressive.  She just says that it will eventually round out on its own.  How many of you have heard that so far?  I remember that we went home the day of her two month check up feeling guilty that the fact that we let her sleep on her right side caused her head to be misshapen. 

This said, I am at home with her for a while and as much as try to reposition her, she always ends up on her back, and slighty on the right, always…  Not only that, she sleeps a lot, and every time I put her on her tummy for tummy time, she throws up.  As a matter of fact, I don’t even have to put her on her tummy, she’ll throw up even if she is just sitting!  It is very frustrating because by 4 months, I also notice that her head is starting to get wider.  We switch insurance and I take her to another ped for her 4 month check up.  Same story same line.  She is fine, her head will round out on its own as she starts to sit up.  Between 4 and 5 months, it still looks pretty bad to me and because I will be going back to work soon, I start doing my own research online.  Hence, the terms, the different helmets, the critical time to start treatment, the outcome, etc, etc…

At birth, Maysa looked just like any other baby.  She was born via C-section so her head looked perfectly round.  I will end this by saying why don’t pediatricians check for torticollis at birth?  Why don’t they emphasize tummy time?  Why don’t they recommend sleep positioners?  Why are some still not pro banding at an early age to prevent further damage? 

I am happy that Maysa’s head has received great correction from her DOC bands, but I feel sad for all parents after us that are or will be faced with the same ordeal.  I just wonder how long before something is effectively done to prevent Plagio.

(As I am re-reading this, I realize that I have skipped through a lot, but like I said at the very start, most of it is in her blog…)

Posted in Cranial Technologies, doc band, eastern cranial affiliates, Maysa, Orthomerica, post DOC band | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments »

Thanks, Melanie…

Posted by mymaysa on April 29, 2009

Thanks to Melanie (one of my online Plagio parent), I now understand why I wasn’t coming up with the same measurements as those from Orthomerica.  Back when Maysa got her first scan from Orthomerica, the part where her head was the widest was right at the center horizontal line of the graph.  Her head was also the longest at the center vertical line.  I always though that the cephalic index was taken by measuring those two lines, no matter whether they were the longest or not.  Apparenlty not.  Melanie explained to me that I have to measure the widest width on her head as well as the longest length.  Since she’s been in the DOC band, Maysa’s widest width has moved down below the center horizontal line (which is what should happen as the head should be wider in the back rather than the front of the head) and that’s why I was getting different numbers.

So…  After I took my ruler again and remeasured her width in the right spot, I basically came up with the same numbers.  Her last CI was a little better using the ruler: 92.68% as opposed to 92.99%. 

I also looked back at the two pictures from Tim’s report and the CI I came up with in the sliced view was 92.4%, so quite comparable after all.  The CI I got from the whole top view of her head was more like 89.7% which tells me that her head still comes out more on the top back than the bottom back by a few millimiters.

This said, I am still really happy with the results we got this far.  Thanks Melanie for clarifying things for me!

Posted in Cranial Technologies, doc band, Maysa, Orthomerica | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Week 13 in DOC band 2

Posted by mymaysa on April 27, 2009

Maysa went in for another adjustment today.  Amber saw us and was accompanied by a colleague from the Connecticut Office.  Of course, I can’t remember her name.  I am so bad with names…  We briefly talked about Tim’s report and how neat it was looking at things from a different perspective.  She asked me how happy I was about Maysa’s progress.  I told her that I WAS happy.  After the disappointing results we got from Eastern Cranial Affiliates, and the actual improvement in Maysa’s headshape since the DOC bands, I HAVE to be happy.

I thought long and hard about asking Amber once again about shaving the band on the back right side, but after looking at Maysa’s head from every possible angle I truly can’t see the “5mm” plagio that’s still left.  If I can’t see it while knowing what I am looking for, then nobody else out there will either, unless it’s an extremely observant plagio parent or a orthotist.  I think that a lot of it has to do with the fact that her head is no longer flat in the back.  It is now round.  It has a curve that hasn’t been there since she was about 6 weeks old.  Amber gave Maysa a little more room in the band by shaving a little more off of it.  I believe that she only shaved the middle back right side of it but I am not sure.

Also, looking at one of the top view pictures on Tim’s report, I was able to overlay it on the scan from Orthomerica and draw the two diagonal lines.  I came up with the same 5mm diagonal difference, however, her Cephalic Index was much lower.  There were two top view pictures of Maysa’s head on the report.  One was similar to a top view picture I would take of her in the tub with her hair all wet, and the other one was a slice top view of it similar to the one that I obtained from Orthomerica.  In the first top view picture, the worse Cephalic Index I could come up with after several measurements was 87.5%.  In the slice view, the worse Cephalic Index I came up with was 91.25%.  This is much lower that the 93% I was given in April.  So I went back to the graphs from Orthomerica, took a cm ruler and measured the CI of the last three reports I got from them.  Here are their measurements and mine:

October 2008 CI:
– Orthomerica -> 98.3%
– My measurements -> 98%

January 2009 CI:
– Orthomerica -> 93.3%
– My measurements -> 92.5%

April 2009 CI:
– Orthomerica -> 93%
– My measurements -> 91.7%

Really, all I did was take a cm ruler and measure the length and width lines on the graph from Orthomerica to obtain the CI.  Have you STARband people tried that before?  I know that it’s completely silly to be competing with computer technology, but I felt so good being able to measure her CI at 91.7% by measuring her graph.  It is also closer to the 91.25% I measured on the picture from Tim’s report from Cranial Tech.  I’ll add to that that this is really what I feel her CI is at this point: around the 91% mark.

Also, we have one more adjustment left scheduled for May 11th.  In four weeks we have our exit appointment.  It will be right around Memorial day weekend, a day to remember.

Posted in Cranial Technologies, doc band, Maysa, Orthomerica | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Mid DSi

Posted by mymaysa on April 8, 2009

8:00 AM this morning, Maysa and I go in to see Amber.  She (and the whole world) knows that I regularly take Maysa to Orthomerica for scans and I’ve showed her previous ones before.  I briefly explain to her what Laura Plank showed me on the graphs yesterday and I express my concerns to her as to the fact that the numbers seem to say that her plagio has regressed by 3mm while in fact I was hoping they would be at 0mm.  We also talk about her Cephalic Index (CI) although that one didn’t get worse.  She honestly says that she is not apt or qualified to read the scans but that “Tim” (I forgot his last name) who is their tech guy in Arizona has asked her to go ahead and do a mid DSi of Maysa’s head so he can analyze the data better and comment or act upon it.  This is the first time they do a mid DSi so I do feel a little weird about it, but at the same time I appreciate how they are listening to my concerns and going the extra step to help address them.

I need to know that I (and everyone else involved) is doing everything possible to help my little Maysa.  Am I a mother or what???  Talking about being a mother, Amber’s daughter also wore a DOC band for a little while so we had a little chat about the fact that she still sees the imperfections in her head shape and that I will always see them in Maysa and others as well.  She just wishes that her daughter had as much hair as Maysa.  I totally understand that at this point, they can only help and not fix and that sooner or later, I’ll have to come to terms with it all.  I know that, but we have 5.5 weeks left in the band.  Let’s make the best of it! 

I probably won’t hear from Amber or Tim until early next week.  How many more gray hair do you think before then?  Of course, I will keep you posted!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The two reports since the DOC bands

Posted by mymaysa on April 8, 2009

Alright, so here are the two reports I got yesterday. 

The first one shows the comparison between January 5th and April 7th (3 months difference).  Just so you know, Maysa got into her second DOC band on February 2nd.

January 5th to April 7th, 2009

January 5th to April 7th, 2009

 
The second one shows the comparison between October 13th and April 7th (almost 6 months).  Maysa got her first DOC band on October 31st. 

October 13th, 2008 to April 7th, 2009

October 13th, 2008 to April 7th, 2009

 

I have to say that I am very happy with the fact that her width has practically remained the same and that her growth has mainly been in her cranial length.  According to another report, the first passive helmet she was in did nothing to keep her head from getting wider.  The DOC bands did.  Thank you CT team!

Needless to say that after getting these reports yesterday, I contacted Amber who scheduled me in this morning at 8:00 AM.  That’s coming in another post…

Posted in Cranial Technologies, doc band, Maysa, Orthomerica, Pictures, Star Cranial Center of Excellence | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Plagio Plague

Posted by mymaysa on April 8, 2009

What a pain, what a pain… You’d think that Maysa is my first child, but no.  She is my second and I worry more about her and this plagio plague than about anything around.  At least for now.

Remember how I told you that I was taking her for another scan at Orthomerica today?  Well, I was able to take her yesterday instead (impatient me) and my head has been spinning ever since I got her latest report.

Before I get started on the report, I want to say something about Laura Plank, the orthotist at Orthomerica in Columbia, MD.  Love her a lot.  She is wonderful.  Not only does she do and take her job seriously, she is also extremely caring.  When you talk to her, you know that you are also talking to the “Mom”, not just the specialist, and that means a lot to me since most people don’t quite relate to the struggle we are faced with for the rest of our little ones lives.  She is positive too and will get you to focus on the brighter side of things…  Yet, I am worried and once again ready to battle this curse.

So, back to the reports now.  The last one she got was back on 1/05/09.  Her brachy was at 93.2%.  Her plagio was at 2.1mm.  Yesterday, 4/07/09, her brachy is at 93% (92.99%).  Her plagio at 5.1mm.  What in the world?  I thought I didn’t have to worry about plagio anymore.  I truly don’t get it.  I was expecting her brachy to be closer to 90% and her plagio to be down to 0mm.  She grew 9mm in circumference in 3 months, not much, but I was expecting more…

Laura tells me that her growth is slowing down and that her sutures are probably starting to fuse.  She says that considering her age and the 5.5 weeks left in the band not to expect much more improvement.  This is basically it.

Feel my frustration.  Help me get through this.  I am loosing my sanity!

I’ll be posting the reports in the following post.

Posted in Maysa, Orthomerica, Star Cranial Center of Excellence | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Scheduled for Another Scan

Posted by mymaysa on February 18, 2009

I just called Orthomerica this morning. I scheduled another appointment with Laura Plank to have her scan Maysa’s head once more. She will see us on April 8th. I can’t wait to see what her head shape looks like on paper and what her numbers will tell us then. The last scan she got was on January 5th. Pray with me that her brachy is well below 90% by then.

Posted in Orthomerica, Star Cranial Center of Excellence | Tagged: , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Week 3 in DOC band 2

Posted by mymaysa on February 17, 2009

Maysa had an appointment yesterday with Amber at Cranial Technologies. She’s been in her new band for two weeks and is doing great. The first week following her initial fit, the band slipped down her eyebrows quite a lot. I constantly had to readjust it. The week after that, it just stopped. It only happens if she pulls at it.

Anyway, Amber drew a square on the foam in the middle back part of the band and said that from now on that was where they would shave off the band. Like I said in a prior post, the foam is really thick and this band is really curved out in the back compared to the first she wore so seeing her shave off some foam out of there is giving me hope that her head will keep rounding out even more.

I caught myself looking at her in the past 3 or 4 days during the hour that the band is off and telling myself how good her head looks to me now. Really. Before, I couldn’t help but notice the sides of her head sticking out and the flatness in the back, especially the back right side. Not anymore. She really looks good to me now and I don’t feel so self conscious for her anymore.

Is her brachy closer to 90% now? How I wish! And, how I wish I could just take her back to Orthomerica now for another scan…

Also, I admit doing something I am not supposed to do: I placed Maysa’s helmet on her 3 year old sister the other day, and guess what? It fit (almost) as well as it does on Maysa’s head. That tells me that if we hit some good growth spurts in the next couple of months, Maysa’s head will really look great once again.

We see Amber back again in two weeks.

Posted in Cranial Technologies, doc band, Orthomerica | Tagged: , , , , | 3 Comments »

Kaiser approved our second DOC band. Hooray!

Posted by mymaysa on January 13, 2009

I am so happy; I can’t find the words to express myself! Kaiser Permanente is now covering our second DOC band in full after initially sending us a denial letter in the mail.

Here is the story:

On December 31st, Kaiser sends a denial letter for a second DOC band stating that “insufficient clinical information has been provided to determine if the requested service is medically indicated. Current clinical information that documents Maysa’s history, examination findings including the current measurements pertinent to establishing the medical necessity of DOC banding that reflects the extent of her response to prior treatment, is required in order to establish whether the requested service is a covered benefit and medically necessary. Therefore, A Durable Medical Equipment (DME) item, DOC banding/cranial remolding banding, from Cranial Technologies, Inc., is not a covered medical benefit, at this time.”

The letter also gave the name of the doctor who denied the claim, Dr. Gregory Alexander, his phone number and address.

Another paragraph also states that our pediatrician could call a number to discuss our case and request a reconsideration on our behalf.

First things first, I try to call Dr. Alexander and leave two messages on his voicemail but I never hear back from him. The third time I call, I get him on the line. He explains to me that the reason why he denied the claim is because he couldn’t read the numbers that CT faxed him. He also said that he asked for new copies but that he never heard back from them. I then contact Sandra Vatalaro. She tells me that Kaiser never tried to contact them. She then emails me all the paperwork she faxed them. I print them out and fax them to Dr. Alexander along with the scans of Maysa from Orthomerica. I attach to that a letter explaining things a bit further.
I also contact my pediatrician via email and ask if she would request a reconsideration on our behalf. I also fax her all the documents I faxed Dr. Alexander and then I wait. The letter said that I should receive an answer within 10 days of submitting the request.

Today, 01/13/2009, I get a call from Tammy, Dr. Alexander’s assistant, with the news that after reviewing the documents I faxed them, that the doctor has approved a second DOC band for Maysa.

I am just so so happy, so happy for my Maysa!

Posted in Cranial Technologies, doc band, Maysa, Orthomerica | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The three reports:

Posted by mymaysa on January 6, 2009

Alright, I had a minute to scan Maysa’s reports this morning and here they are:

The first one was taken on 6/24/08 during our initial evaluation, when we were still trying to determine what she actually had and if she would benefit from helmet treatment or not.

 STAR Scan June 2008

The second one was taken on 10/13/08 back when I had doubts about how well Maysa’s passive helmet from Eastern Cranial Affiliates was working for her.  I let you be the judge, but in my opinion and looking at the report itself, the helmet didn’t do anything about keeping her head from growing on the sides.  It didn’t correct her plagio at all either.  In fact, Laura Plank from Orthomerica, explained to me that looking at both scans, both her brachy and plagio got worse.

STAR Scan June/October 2008

The third one shows how she’s progressed since she’s been in the DOC band and since we’ve done CST.  Her plagio is now within normal range at 2.1mm and her brachy has gone down from 98.2% to 93.2%.

STAR Scan October 2008/ January 2009

There you have it.  Love the DOC band and love the Starscanner a lot!

Posted in Cranial Technologies, CST Appointments, doc band, Maysa, Orthomerica, Pictures, Star Cranial Center of Excellence | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Laura Plank, thank you…

Posted by mymaysa on January 6, 2009

I took Maysa to her third scan on Monday to Orthomerica in Columbia, MD.  I couldn’t wait for my 2 o’clock appointment to come.  I made it there on time.  There was no traffic, and Maysa slept for the entire hour it took me to get there.  We went in.  She scanned her.  She showed me her report.

Thank you for putting my mind at ease.  Although I have known from the start that the DOC band was doing what it’s supposed to be doing, I just had to see it on paper in numbers and shape.

Again, thank you.

Posted in doc band, Maysa, Orthomerica, Star Cranial Center of Excellence | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »